Keeping the house on one income
After a separation, a parent of two wants to keep the Haberfield house the children have grown up in. Their share of the settlement requires paying the former partner $310,000, on a single income of $105,000 plus child support. Most calculators say impossible. The real assessment is closer than the calculators think, and sometimes it genuinely is impossible, which also needs saying early.
The situation
The home is worth about $1.45 million with $520,000 owing. The property settlement gives the staying parent the house in exchange for the $310,000 payment. Child support of roughly $1,400 a month is registered and reliably paid. The refinanced loan would be about $830,000, on one income.
The problem
Servicing $830,000 on $105,000 is demanding under any lender's buffered assessment. The question that decides the file is what else counts as income: many lenders will assess registered, demonstrably-received child support, some fully, some partially, some only while the children are young. Lender selection is not a detail here; it is the whole outcome, as our separation guide sets out.
What made it difficult
Three pressure points. Serviceability: even with child support counted, the numbers are tight, and honest levers, term length, expense discipline, a small contribution from the settlement's other assets, all matter. Sequencing: lenders want the settlement documented before approving the buyout refinance, but the numbers must be tested before the agreement is signed, or the parent may agree to a buyout no lender will fund. And the emotional weight: this decision needs numbers precisely because everything else about it is not numerical.
What a broker assesses
Full single-income serviceability at buffered rates, with and without the child support counted, across the lenders that accept it. The equity position, deep equity is what makes the file possible at all. The duty exemption, confirmed through the solicitor, which saves genuine five-figure money on the transfer. And the honest alternative, costed: what selling, splitting and rebuying elsewhere actually looks like, so the decision to keep the house is a choice rather than a reflex.
Illustrative sequence, the order and availability depend on the actual file and lender policy at the time.
The lending considerations
Files like this succeed on deep equity, formalised child support at a lender that counts it, and a settlement negotiated around fundable numbers. They fail when the buyout figure was agreed emotionally first and tested financially second. A broker's most valuable contribution often happens before mediation, not after, and where the honest answer is "the house cannot be kept", hearing it early protects everyone, children included.
What borrowers can take from this
Test the lending before you agree to the buyout, not after. Formalise child support if it needs to count. Use the duty exemption, it is real money, routinely missed. And let the alternative be priced properly: keeping the house is sometimes the right answer and sometimes a financial anchor; only the numbers know which.
Related guides
This is an illustrative example scenario, not a description of a specific client and not a testimonial. The figures are realistic but rounded, no lender is named, and no outcome is promised, every application is assessed on its own facts. General information only, not credit or financial advice.
Get the numbers before the negotiation.
Twenty minutes with Charles, ideally before mediation: what one income can truly carry, which lenders count the support, and a buyout figure that can actually be funded.
Prefer a callback?Charles calls back within one business day. No documents needed yet.

